Randomistas and Methodological Fetishism. Lessons From Covid-19 Pandemic

  • Mattia Andreoletti Universit√† Vita-Salute San Raffaele (Italy)
Keywords: evidence-based medicine, methodology, theory choice, covid-19

Abstract

It has now been more than a year since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, despite the colossal and unprecedented scientific effort that has been put into it, many claims are still opaque, and many issues must be solved. Among these, one deserves the attention of philosophers of science: the scientific controversy about the theories of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In this short paper, I analyze the debate between the droplet theory and the airborne theory of viral transmission. I argue that the acceptance of the droplet theory has been due to the philosophical commitments of the dominant scientific actors to a specific theory of evidence, which has become dominant in western democracies, and to a specific set of non-epistemic values, rather than to scientific considerations alone.

Published
2021-12-27
How to Cite
Andreoletti, M. (2021). Randomistas and Methodological Fetishism. Lessons From Covid-19 Pandemic. HUMANA.MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 14(40), 149-162. Retrieved from https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/374