Four Theses on the Alleged Innocence of Mereology

  • Massimiliano Carrara Department of Philosophy, University of Padua, Italy
  • Enrico Martino Department of Philosophy, University of Padua, Italy
Keywords: mereology

Abstract

In Parts of Classes David Lewis attempts to draw a sharp contrast between mereology and set theory and he tries to assimilate mereology to logic. For him, like logic but unlike set theory, mereology is “ontologically innocent”. In mereology, given certain objects, no further ontological commitment is required for the existence of their sum. On the contrary, by accepting set theory, given certain objects, a further commitment is required for the existence of the set of them. The latter – unlike the sum of the given objects – seems to be an abstract entity whose existence is not directly entailed by the existence of the objects themselves. The argument for the innocence of mereology is grounded on the thesis of composition as identity. In our paper we argue that: (T1) arguments for the ontological innocence of mereology are not conclusive. (T2) Some arguments against the ontological innocence of mereology show a certain ambiguity in the innocence thesis itself. (T3) The innocence thesis seems to depend on a general conception of the nature of objects and on how the notion of ontological commitment is understood. Specifically, we think that the thesis is the manifesto of a realistic conception of parts and sums. (T4) Quine‟s notorious criticism of the set-theoretical interpretation of second order logic seems to be reproducible against Lewis‟defence of mereology. To the purpose we construct a mereological model of a substantive fragment of set theory, adequate to ground the set-theoretical semantics of second order logic.

Published
2018-05-24
How to Cite
Carrara, M., & Martino, E. (2018). Four Theses on the Alleged Innocence of Mereology. HUMANA.MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies, 4(19), 57-77. Retrieved from http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/17